Thinking of Posting on arXiv? Read This First
Many people have asked me why my notes on quantum computing are not published or even available on arXiv.
Before I explain the reason, let me share a story.
Last week, while searching for references for a survey paper on "Quantum Computing for Finance" that I am writing, I came across a paper on arXiv.
The authors heavily use ChatGPT and the paper is full of mistakes.
However, what stood out most was something I had never seen before (if you're aware of this practice, please, let me know in the comments): there are references that don’t exist!
For instance, the paper cites works by "John Smith", "Sarah Johnson," and "Michael Brown," with titles and journal names full of keywords such as "Quantum Computing," "Quantum Information Science," "Quantum Computing and Information," "Machine Learning," and "Quantum Machine Learning."
I tried to find these references to take a look, but I couldn’t find them anywhere—other than in the paper itself.
After digging deeper, I realized that these "papers" were never actually published.
They were certainly fabricated for SEO (Search Engine Optimization) purposes!
Now, why aren’t my quantum computing notes on arXiv?
Here’s the story:
I submitted the second part, but arXiv claimed it was too similar to the first part (which appeared already on arXiv) and advised me to update the first part instead.
When I explained that the two parts (each with almost 70 pages) didn’t even share a single line, they threatened to revoke my right to submit papers in the future if I tried again.
I don't know how arXiv operates and, honestly, I don’t even care anymore.
If I want to publish something, I will post it here on LinkedIn to share with you or submit it to a proper peer-reviewed journal.
Want to dive deeper? My eBook is a great place to start → https://www.ozatp.com/qaf
